我是因判無罪!才告回對方誣告罪呀!可是竟然淹滅證據判警察及假證 人無罪!我沒罪, 對方也沒罪!那誰有罪呢?I was acquitted before it was back to the other malicious accusation! But even flooded to destroy evidence of contracting the Police and false innocence I am not guilty, and the other not guilty! That Who is guilty? 
網址http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VtEUCgtnTs

扯蛋政府 馬英九!已經出信判無罪!我要告回誣告罪!竟淹滅證據判警察無罪

台中地檢署可以關門了!這機構才是詐騙集團,詐欺人民的薪資!
詐騙花招如下種種:

1.知道對方證據十足! 不偵查即淹滅證據! 並且直接寄文書判無罪>.<不起訴信函!

2,就算偵查也是以牠們套好的情節模式來訊問偵查,還呼徿你不准發言,回說其它時間再偵訊, 等到二,三次偵查完,輪不到你發言說證據時>.<就會變出二個假證人無碰面對質偵訊下,寄文書告訴你對方證人做證判無罪,不起訴!
更好笑告的主題會被轉移!而且淹滅你證據是常用的例子!

你們說這台中地檢署是不是詐騙集團呢!申請再議再判無罪看看!老娘告你這機構告到國際法庭你試看看!

被台中一分局警察無證據告妨害風化罪,後收到不起訴的信函, 本人還要繼續深造當老師 被誣告的家人 朋友 客戶 知道讓我顏臉盡丟 老客戶全遺失(((((沒生意可做))))決定告台中一分警察找的假證人賴建達,吳聰男二人誣告,毀謗罪.

罪行情形如下:
管理室大廳很多人出入,沒人 事 物 時間 地點 等我抓我,並大聲說我防害風化, 1 (此舉公然侮辱形成)!全程有錄影做證!

後一進我工作室搜索時因警察沒說明簽的內容,故意騙我要先簽名,所以犯下 , 2 (刑法第十三條故意罪),還好我打給我律師並叫我不可簽名, 

還有˙之前被切電話 ˙我客戶質問我為甚麼給警查電話,我說沒有,是電話被第三分局賴信志警員無人 事 物 時間 地點 發公文B100070138字號給165內政部,說我是色情應遭召切斷,這也是故意罪陷阱,( 3) ,(刑法125條濫用職權罪),切斷電話本人還要付電話費不合理.所以這之間我有寫二次存證信函給第三分局賴信志警員要它復話,不然要提告類通知,

我很多客戶都被電話騷擾過,我想是警察他们應該調台灣大哥大通訊記錄得知客戶電話! ( 4 ) ,憲第八自由權 (犯下秘密通訊自由罪),台灣大哥大電信調我客戶電話,還一一打電話給我的剪髮客戶訊問有無從事色情行業 ,( 5 ) 此舉犯下刑310條(毀謗罪),

在我工作室搜索時,本人有配合5位警察搜索,可是這五位警察騙不到我簽名.竟然扣手鍊鎖住我手!PS:我有配合,所以此舉犯下, ( 6 ) , (刑第126條凌虐人犯罪)!

因不起訴! 形成了 ( 7 ), (刑法第169條誣告罪), ( 8 ) .則形成刑法第134條(瀆職罪),
警局 無 人 事 物 時間 地點亂定罪!並侵犯我隱私權拿走我電腦密碼不簿,手機 及二台電腦 並要我現場開機密碼,開電腦,我已錄起不合邏輯的要求,鎖我部落格帳號 還有b_b_2009@pchome.com.tw帳號,

( 9 ),警察也涉及(偽造文書罪),亂判罪名:先是色情援交,後又是防害風化罪抓我,最後不起訴書又(多加)變成兒少性交易,
刑法第169條

規定，意圖他人受刑事或懲戒處分，向該管公務員誣告者，處
七年以下有期徒刑。
意圖他人受刑事或懲戒處分，而偽造、變造證據，或使用偽造
、變造之證據者，亦同。

Chedan Government Ma Ying-jeou has a letter acquitted! I would like to report back to the malicious accusation actually flooded to destroy evidence to sentence innocent police!
Taichung District Prosecutors Office can close this agency is a scam, fraud salaries of the people!Fraud tricks are as follows all kinds of:

1, Know each other evidence of full is not the investigation is flooded to destroy evidence and sent directly to the instrument acquitted> <not to prosecute letter!

2, even if the investigation is they set a good plot mode to interrogate the investigation, call Long you are not allowed to speak, back to that other time interrogation, speaking on evidence until two or three times the investigation finished, not your>. will become the two false witnesses meet confrontation under the interrogation, send instruments to tell you that the other party witness testimony acquitted, not to prosecute!Notice the theme will be transferred to better laugh! Flooded off your evidence is a common example.

You say this Taichung District Prosecutors' Office is not a scam! Apply Discussion acquitted see his aging mother to sue you to the agencies report to the International Tribunal, you take a look at!

Taichung, a branch of police, there is no evidence to report the crime of violation of public decency, after receipt of the letter not to prosecute, I have to continue their studies with family and friends when the teacher was falsely accused of customers know let me Yan face do lose old customers all lost ((((( no business to do)))) decided to report Taichung one point the police to find the false Lai Jian Wu Tsung-men and two false accusation and defamation.

Crime is as follows: 
Management Office hall and out a lot of people, not anyone or anything that time and place I had taken me, and loudly say that I am anti-harm weathering (which would affront to the formation of) the entire video do!

Police did not explain to sign the contents of the latter into my studio, search, and deliberately lied to me first signature, and so committed, 2 (Article 13 of the Penal Code deliberately sin), but fortunately, I called my lawyer and told me to not be the signature

Before there is ˙ cut telephone ˙ my customers asking me why I check the phone to the police, I said no, it is the phone is the third branch of police officers depends on the letter Chi no one things the time and place of the document the B100070138 font to 165 Ministry of the Interior, said I was pornographic should was cut off by the call, this is also intentional trap of sin, (3), (125 of the Criminal Code crime of abuse), cut off the telephone, I also pay for the call is unreasonable. so this I have to write the second as evidence a letter to Third Branch Lai Shun Chi police officers want it complex, or to sue the class notice.

Many of my customers are telephone harassment, I think they should adjust the records of Taiwan Mobile Communications police learned that the customer calls! (4), the constitution eighth liberty (committed by the secret crime of freedom of communication), Taiwan Mobile Telecom tune I customer calls, but also one by one call to my haircut customers questioning whether the sex industry, (5) This commit criminal 310 (defamation)

In search of my studio, I have with the five police search, but these five police officers to lie to see my signature. Even buckle bracelet locked my hand PS: I have a tie, so this commit (6) (Crime 126 abuse crime)!

Not to prosecute (7), (169 of the Penal Code malicious accusation), (8) the formation of 134 of the Criminal Law (Offenses of Malfeasance)Police no one thing time and place of chaos conviction! Took my computer passwords book and violation of my privacy, cell phones and computers and to the I-site power-on password, open the computer, I have recorded from the illogical, lock my blog account there b_b_2009@pchome.com.tw of account number,

(9), the police also involved (forgery), arbitrary sentence counts: first porn compensated dating, and then anti-harm weathering crime arrest me, and finally the indictment and (more) become children deal169 of the Criminal Law

Provisions and intent of others by criminal or disciplinary action to the false accusation of by civil servants atSeven years imprisonment.Intent of others by criminal or disciplinary action, forged or altered evidence, or the use of forgedOr altered evidence, they are made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------我是因判無罪!才告回對方誣告罪呀!可是竟然淹滅證據判警察及假證 人無罪!我沒罪, 對方也沒罪!那誰有罪呢?I was acquitted before it was back to the other malicious accusation! But even flooded to destroy evidence of contracting the Police and false innocence I am not guilty, and the other not guilty! That Who is guilty? 
網址http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VtEUCgtnTs------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

To check flooded to destroy the evidence to court recorded地檢淹滅證據出庭錄1

www.youtube.com

申 請再議淹滅證據:已經出信判無罪!我要告回誣告罪!竟淹滅證據判警察無罪台中地檢署可以關門了!這機構才是詐騙集團,詐欺人民的薪資!淹滅證據:主題告誣 告罪!竟寄信函來判警察無罪，並且改主題為侵佔罪! Flooded destroy evidence: Subject report malicious accusati...