This is the last year in March 2013, things is illegal unconstitutional ROC Article 22 7 not allowed me anti-rail card would not let me publish the fact that the perpetrators !!
Falsely accused me (the crime of obstruction of a secret prison to shut me to do) to help the government electromagnetic wave visible Guoan 曹大伟 against me, and would not let me video in any public place!
Because consortium together with the government to destroy evidence,
Bandits ROC government to civil consortium bold break the law (permits license)

這是去年2013年三月的事,也是ROC違法違憲第22條第7條不准我反軌證不准我公佈犯罪人事實!!
誣告我(妨害秘密罪要關我做監牢)可見是政府幫電磁波國安曹大偉陷害我的,不准我在任何公共場所錄影!
是因為財團與政府要一起湮滅證據,
土匪ROC政府給公務員財團大膽犯法(permits證照)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

PS;台中地檢扭曲事實證據:Dry your mother! ROC Taichung District Prosecutors! Liu Wenbin you're dead! Zhang Wen-American Human Rights Association of AIT where was I to find Look! Dare false accusations me(aging mother who I was whistleblowing) identity,=  Exposing whistleblower leak Taichung District Prosecutors! Evidence of malfeasance against the law unconstitutional eat case and annihilation Evidence case!
 Falsely accused me (prejudice secret distorting the truth)
Documents  :
      (whistleblowing who protection: for internal expose wrongdoing or legal publicly disclosed evidence of public and private institutions employees, "corruption Act," provides a protective provisions to protect whistleblowing effective implementation of the government's laws.). http://www.ait.org.tw/zh/2013-human-rights-report-taiwan-part.html
公文
揭漏告密者:違憲湮滅證據瀆職犯法吃案!
Evidence of malfeasance against the law unconstitutional eat case and annihilation Evidence case!
  ROC台中地檢!劉文賓

你大瀆職罪!美國AIT裡人權協會的章文被我找到請看!
還敢誣告
(我是揭弊者)身份!  = 暴露舉報人洩露台中地方法院檢察!瀆職侵權違法違憲吃案及湮滅證據案件的證據!  誣告我(妨害秘密扭曲事實)
公文如下:
    (揭弊者保護:對於進行內部揭露或合法公開揭露不法行為證據的公私機構員工,《貪污治罪條例》訂有保護條款。政府有效執行保護揭弊者的法律)。

http://www.ait.org.tw/zh/2013-human-rights-report-taiwan-part.html
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    DBS Bank managers learn to play tricks ROC governance corruption, said: Can not take pictures DBS crime situation is not video evidence The scene anti-rail video evidence of the accounts,
electromagnetic voice design, great criminal,citizens point into listening to Oh!
DBS Bank to tamper with the original mortgage contract interest rate for the first time do not have an appointment to give me the original loan contract photos as evidence, but did not dare to lie to me three times, did not dare to face to face reconciliations count to me,

3,9% interest rate plus my Chaos, ROC provisions homebuyers preferential loans gone once in a lifetime, it should go with the post office rates, but actually can electromagnetic wave ROC spy Cao Dawei, it became illegal usury banks, but also eat my principal amount consumer protection officer also DBS flooded help destroy evidence, please referendum boycott,
http: //youtu.be/-f8FF1OIATA

DBS did not dare to face to face scene settle accounts of the accounts
DBS現場不敢當面算帳對帳目

不可錄影,電磁波的語氣設計的,犯罪很大,公民點進聽喔
星展銀行竄改房貸合約利率要正本不給第一次,已經約好給我貸款合約正本拍照存證,可是騙我三次不敢給,也不敢當面對帳算給我看,

亂加我3、9%利率,ROC規定一生一次購屋優惠貸款不見了,也應該跟郵局率走,可是卻聽電磁波ROC特務曹大偉的話,變成犯法高利貸銀行,還吃我本金,消保官還幫星展淹滅證據,請全民抵制,

http://youtu.be/-f8FF1OIATA

星展經理玩花招學ROC說不可錄影,電磁波的語氣設計的,犯罪很大,公民點進聽喔
星展銀行竄改房貸合約利率要正本不給第一次,電話已約好給我貸款合約正本拍照存證,可是騙我三次不敢給,也不敢當面對帳算給我看
Evidence ROC second time Of leakage of filling eat Litigation case On site ,現場有錄影,我們有憲法第七條法律人人平等無階級之分,我當然可學你們私法人反軌證錄影,何況憲法第二條主權在民,第22條憲法保障,你們政腐是人民聘 請,當然可以錄影反軌證,公佈你們瀆職吃案,何況捷星案件吃一次,103年當然從新按鈴申告,又漏餡呼嚨霧化證詞案號,現場不錄怎麼可以,從台中到桃園整 個台灣司法一定要密錄對付之,公務員才會老實辦案,我發誓台灣公務員及財團全被電磁波控制住了,不配合財團即倒閉呢!就像我以前唱歌期間,不嫁ROC國安曹大偉特務,就會被陷害後半身家破人亡,沈落20多年到現在還際
繼續一直威逼我呢!
 
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Evidence ROC second time Of leakage of filling eat Litigation case On site
給ROC地檢署私法人看法規,甚麼叫防害隱私權啦!我登你們姓名了嗎,我有寫姓名嗎!我只寫吃案,真實證據不怕毀謗罪,何況我有憲法22條及第七條可反軌 證!!公佈你們司法人滅證犯法影片是私人活動,私生活地方嗎!法院,法庭裡是你們家嗎!讀法律讀到那裡去了,請全世界鄙視,扭曲事實丟人現眼,不要臉!
誣告我,硬要關我做牢
PS:隱私權,指個人人格上的利益不受不法僭用或侵害,個人與大眾無合法關聯的私事,亦不得妄予發布公開,而其私人活動,不得以可能做成一般人的精神痛苦 或感覺羞辱之方式非法侵入的權利。是為眾多法律系統所支持的一種人身基本權利。由於它的存在,政府和民間團體的某些活動受到一定的限制。
http://youtu.be/FEWiJKA4_Tc
Evidence ROC second time Of leakage of filling eat Litigation case On site
ROC private law framed me, SOS Hellp me!
USA I need to help, requested to friends to help me, ROC three powers are not separation, President Ma forget (International Constitution) is greater inconsistent with the legal, the Constitution is greater than the rank of the legal, ROC learn Chen Shui-bian Style as to illegal off I do the prison,

USA I need to 求救,請各網友幫我, ROC三權不分立,馬 總統 忘記(國際憲法)抵觸到法律,則是憲法大於法律之位階,卻正準備學陳水扁一樣要違法關 ­我做監牢,給ROC台中地檢署私法人看法規,甚麼叫防害隱私權啦!我登你們名子了嗎,我有寫內容資料嗎!我只寫吃案,真實證據不怕毀謗罪,何況我有憲法 22條及第七條可反軌證!!公佈你們司法人滅證犯法影片是私人活動,私生活地方嗎!法院,法庭裡是你們家嗎!讀法律讀到那裡去了,全世界鄙視,扭曲事實丟 人現眼,不要臉來誣告我,硬要關我做牢
PS:隱私權,指個人人格上的利益不受不法僭用或侵害,個人與大眾無合法關聯的私事,亦不得妄予發布公開,而其私人活動,不得以可能做成一般人的精神痛苦 或感覺羞辱之方式非法侵入的權利。是為眾多法律系統所支持的一種人身基本權利。由於它的存在,政府和民間團體的某些活動受到一定的限制。

http://youtu.be/0dyUQ7-NxwA

I am plaintiff identity lawsuit Cathay United Bank each other's identity, then 刘文宾 prosecutor forget I am lawsuit plaintiff identity went so far violated Article VIII of the Constitution of the personal freedom crime, flooded destroy evidence secret recording snatch my glasses,

caused by I recorded a secret anti-rail permit there are reasons for is the (there are the underlying reason why),I Was not so bored cause record submerged destroy evidence of their criminal situation?

the prosecution case flooded destroy evidence eat case first, (and even does not reconnaissance handling cases), ate the evidence,

我 是訴訟國泰世華銀行對方的原告身份,則劉文賓檢察官忘記我是 lawsuit plaintiff identity竟違憲法第八條­人身自由罪,淹滅證據,搶奪我密錄眼鏡,引起我反軌證密錄是有原因的 是(有原故),我那麼無聊無故錄他們犯罪淹滅證據情形, 地檢吃我案子淹滅證據在先,(甚至於不偵察辦案),就吃了證據,

PS: send (docket number Document have not changed reconnaissance the word) letter ate case , said: Not guilty Innocent where no evidence has been concluded, has been long as five years, I have written a letter to the post office deposit permit and Taichung Taichung District Prosecutors Supreme People's Procuratorate,

Post office letter as evidence against ROC private law people ROC judicial useless!Also eat case

PS:並寄(公文案號還沒改偵字)­信就吃案,說:查無Not guilty Innocent證據已結案,已五年之久,我都有寫郵局存證信函 給台中地檢與台中高檢,

郵局存證信涵對ROC司法人沒用!照吃案,

ROC framed me

(1) I am not know Registrar also sued me, lawsuit me victims to privacy, I did not write the name , and regulations does not form a sin, the court serving to work them civil servants, (upload youtube videos Public Servants them eat case of, the Taichung District Prosecutors non-private place, PS emphasis was not any written name), that the be privacy it?!

ROC陷害我

(1),我不認識的書記官還起訴我防害隱私權罪,我­又沒寫姓名法規不形成罪,而且是公務員法院任職上班當中,(上傳youtube公務員任職當中吃案影片,非私 人的地方,PS重點又沒寫name),那來隱­私呢?

Taichung District Prosecutors lawsuit me another litigation Penal harm sin,
(2),台中地檢又訴訟我刑法防害公務罪,

ROC forget Constitution rank greater than criminal law,

so I have Self-defense reason to fight with bailiffs, prosecutors and judicial police investigators to close public handling cases court room room door locked,

ROC忘記憲法大於刑法位階,我是有故有原因與法警搏鬥,檢察官與法警先關門鎖上公眾的偵查室大門,

Prosecutor unconstitutional personal freedom sin. break the law, sin Destruction of evidence is destroyed snatch sin, particularly unconstitutional Article VIII personal freedom of, private law Yeah!
ROC私法犯法違憲人身自由罪, 搶奪罪淹滅證據毀損罪,特別違憲第八條人身自由罪,私法呀!

At the 18th reconnaissance room again lawsuit me (anti-harm official crime), is (bailiff forget I was the plaintiff identity), shut the door from the reconnaissance room ,snatch my glasses behavior secret recording sin committed snatch, head to (submerged destroy me anti-rail permit) of evidence and destruction perpetrated sin destruction of to break glasses, then with hands and feet chained
me, to the law unconstitutional Article VIII (the personal freedom sin) in custody to me,

在第18偵察室裡又 lawsuit me(防害公務罪),是(法警忘記我是原告人身份­),關鎖起偵察室大門,搶奪我密錄眼鏡行為犯下搶奪罪,目地(淹滅我反 軌證)之證據,並毀損­折斷眼鏡犯下毀損罪,後來用手腳鐵鍊要違法違憲第八條(人身自由罪)羈押我,

ROC forget actually I am the identity of the plaintiff,
I am wronged captive in the grievances wronged (self-defense) under instinctive cries for help, only to fight against the bailiff to bite his fingers, it is the instinct of self-defense, so of course I use Article VII of the Constitution legal of equality, no class distinction, the court there video, class distinction, of course I can use (for a reason injustice so) be anti-rail evidence ,

竟忘記我是­原告人之身份,
我是在冤情自保(自衛)本能之下喊救命,才跟法警對抗咬他手指,那是本能自衛,所以我當然用憲法第­七條法律人人平等,無階級之分,法庭裡有錄影,無階級之分,我當然 可以用(有原因有冤故)來反軌­證,

I use this Constitution Article 22 International genuine democracy, I am not(no reason is injustice ) to announce Justice (private law) them public servants serving food case of, Destruction of evidence is the case, but was Liu Wenbin:

我用這真民主國際憲法第22條, 我並非(無故是有冤故)來公佈司法(私法)公務人員任職當中吃案,淹滅證據情形,可是卻被劉文賓:

PS distort the truth, Unprovoked to anti-rail video permit) falsely accused I have the secret anti-sin victims prosecution!
無緣無故
PS:(扭曲事實,說我無故錄影反軌證)誣告我防害密秘罪­起訴!

(3), and afterwards summoned to appear in court of second instance the inquest (18 tribunal investigating chamber lawsuit Cathay United Bank) reconnaissance videos

(3),事後傳喚出庭 第二審勘驗(第18庭偵查室lawsuit國泰世華銀行)偵察影片,

Out exactly as I said (prosecutor Liu Wenbin) Destruction of evidence is break the law unconstitutional behavior, I gave him the evidence in chambers, told Cathay United Bank anti-sin victims of illegal blockade honorary I have (personal credit blacklist), the

完全如我所說(檢察官劉文賓)違憲犯法淹滅證據行為,庭內我給他證據,告國­泰世華銀行防害名譽罪之違法封鎖我(個人信用黑名單)時,

Out exactly as I said (prosecutor Liu Wenbin) Destruction of evidence is break the law unconstitutional behavior, I gave him the evidence in reconnaissance reconnaissance room , lawsuit Cathay United Bank anti-sin victims of illegal blockade honorary I have (personal credit blacklist), the Destruction
完全如我所說(檢察官劉文賓)違憲犯法淹滅證據行為,庭內
我給他證據,並告國­泰世華銀行(防害名譽罪)之違法封鎖我(個人信用黑名單)時

Liu Wenbin prosecutor actually hand holding evidence, face raised in front of photography actually say (DBS) lock me blacklist,

劉文賓 檢察官 竟手拿著證據,臉­抬高竟對著攝影說是(星展銀行)鎖我黑名單,
(公然睜眼說瞎話,扭曲事實吃案之離譜),又大膽越權違憲亂羈押­我,(忘記我是原告身 份)
(Blatantly out and out lie, outrageous case of distorting facts to eat), and bold ultra vires in custody unconstitutional disorder me, ( forget I am the plaintiff identity),
(公然睜眼說瞎話,扭曲事實吃案之離譜),又大膽越權違憲亂羈押­我,(忘記我是原告身 份),
(Blatantly out and out lie, outrageous the case of distorting facts to eat), and bold ultra vires detention unconstitutional mess In custody me,
(ROC forget I am the plaintiff identity),

亂羈押我情節之訴說跟 (勘驗影片子經過一樣),我女兒及我律師二位­證人,也有在法庭內一同看(勘驗影片見證),

Mess in custody telling the plot with ( the inquest video the same episode
),my Daughter and my lawyer testimony two witnesses , also in the courtroom watching together
All the inquest or video,Gave evidence the same inquest same the episode,
Is ROC Judicialn 私法人犯法 prosecutor
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A few months later, a fourth judgment court said: acquitted go back to such notice, my lawyer and daughter were present heard the, but the Taichung District Prosecutors have sent (no cover documents Seal of the Taichung District Prosecutors' s come sentenced me sinful), the letter said that to be off eight months, I still announced in FB,

幾個月後,出法庭第四審判說:無罪回去等通知,我律師及女兒­都在場聽到,可是台中地檢 卻寄來(無蓋台中地檢之印章之公文來判我有罪),信說要關八個月,我依然公佈於FB, ­

ROC know I uploaded in FB sealed letters Taichung District Prosecutors' s without cover seal evidence, Taichung District Court ruling by private falsely accused me and my sins, Want to be the prison without cover seal of of the document after in custody me,
中華民國知道我上傳到FB封信件台中地檢的不蓋公章的證據,台中地方法院判決由私人誣陷我和我的罪,想成為沒有文件後羈押蓋公章監獄我

ROC知道我上傳在FB無蓋章信件證據,台中地院用私法誣告我,並判決我罪, 要關我做監牢 的無­蓋印章台中地檢之公文後,

Two day later, ROC Taichung District Prosecutors would really send a registered letter with a lid seal, I went to the police station after the collar letters crazy island of Taiwan (political and legal becomes private), the same as Chen Shui-bian, insists framed planted with me for five years, or to be fined NT $ 1 million or more,

二day日後,ROC台中地檢就真的寄有蓋印章的掛號信,我去警察局領信件­後,瘋子台灣本島(政法變私法),像陳水扁一樣,硬要誣陷栽贓關我五年,不 然要罰100萬­臺幣以上,

I was (ROC of electromagnetic waves mind control framed of tangible and intangible later life 20 years), causing me to ruin and death, my husband jumped to for no reason, under of electromagnetic waves mind control my the brain 20 years Dabu Wan's lawsuit, the business is also the brain control the ups and downs, ROC Already has been restricted me go abroad, will the money that was surprising! I have no money, ROC play private law Yeah,

我被(ROC電磁波腦控陷害有形無形後半生20多年了),害我家破人亡,我的老公無故跳樓,電磁波下意念腦控我20多年打不完的官司, 生意也被腦控起起落落,又被ROC限制出國,會有錢那才奇怪!我沒錢,ROC玩私法呀,

I invited friends to the World Association of relevant international human rights phone or web, I request rescue! SOS, Taichung District Prosecutors are still document in a note saying that this is the judgment of the president,

請各網友給我相關國際世界人權協會電話或網址,我要求救!­SOS,台中地檢還在公文裡註明說,這是總統判決 的,

This time I realized people really framed my original Four years ago I discovered the continent FB users publish documents: first 任吴伯 t bear Two 任连叔 three presidents Communist mayor the Ma secret traitor, I do citizen reporter , immediately ripping people uploading YouTube announced know President Ma him treason,

這回我悟到了真正陷害我的人,原­來四年前我發現FB大陸網友公佈文件:第一任吳伯熊 二任連叔叔 三任馬先生 總統做中共區長的賣國賊­密秘,做公民記者的我,馬上 翻錄上傳YouTube公佈民眾知道馬先生總統他判國,

Results realized it! Really want to fix me off my false accusation is president ROC it! President Chen Shui-bian, but also to learn as capricious and distort the truth, forget the Constitution contradict the law, then the law is greater than the regulatory process! Section 22 of the Constitution, even if I do not, but I still have the Constitution Article VII of the law everyone is equal, no class distinction, the court in there are videos, no class distinction, of course I can use ( I am not no reason )) to the anti-rail card! civil servants in the public courtroom

(PS non-private places) serving openly among investigators as bold as bandits destroy evidence eat collective unconstitutional the case! civic and moral will to do! second (popular sovereignty) of the Constitution, I have the right to announce to the world! fact false democracy ROC (separation of powers does not)!

Peoples sentenced mess crime, please worldwide despise him ROC! SOS Hello me! I request rescue, invited friends to help me!

結 果悟到了!真­正要整我誣告陷害關我的是ROC總統呢!而且還學陳水扁總統一樣枉法扭曲事實,忘記憲法抵­觸法 律,則大於法律之規章程!就算我不用憲法第22條 ,可是我還有憲 法第­七條法律人人平等,無階級之分,法庭裡有錄影,無階級之分,我當然 可以用(有原因有冤故)來反軌­證!公務人員在公眾法庭內(PS非私人地方)公然

Among handling the case worked as bold as bandits destroy evidence eat collective unconstitutional the case! Civic and moral will to do! Second (popular sovereignty) of the Constitution, I have the right to announce to the world! Fact false democracy ROC (no separation of powers)!

任職當中辦案大膽如土匪般集體違憲違法湮滅證據吃案!公民道德必做!憲法 第二條(主權在民)我有權公佈於世!ROC(三權不分立)假民主之事實!

亂判人民罪,請全世界鄙視他ROC! SOS Hello me!我要求救,請各網友幫我!

http://youtu.be/0dyUQ7-NxwA
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

台中地檢吃案玩私法時,逃避責任寄來的公文是不敢寫檢察官名子跟蓋台中地檢署印章的,司法人違憲瀆職犯法在先,竟集體反誣告我(防害密秘罪)要關我做監牢,我先PO些小證據給全世界先看出細節,真敢關我出來時大秘密證據我一定會不客氣公佈於世界的,http://youtu.be/XXREAnAtupY

台中地檢吃案玩私法時,逃避責任寄來的公文是不敢寫檢察官名子跟蓋台中地檢署印章的,司法...
www.youtube.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

我 是美容美髮美甲芳療師開家庭室工做室,因電磁波腦控曹大偉國安特務加持陷害我20多年一直打不完的官司 ,然後有在馬英九部落格陳情,卻不甩鳥你陳情,還讓黨工在噗浪留言說要封鎖我部落格,結果FB張碧苾帳號就被封鎖掉了,之後又指使一分局派出所來違憲違法 羈押我一天,他們忘記憲法第十條(自由居住權)不可亂抓人,無 人 事 物 時間地點下羈押我,偵訊時並且找二位我不認識的假證人說我跟他們去簡愛汽車旅館交易,我回他們請拿出證據,工作室裡有攝錄影機,而且我一直在工作室裡有不 在場證明,沒收走我的電話打給我客戶一一調查,毀謗我,又在工作室裡沒收我二台筆電,也有攝錄機證實,知道誣告陷害不成,第二日才讓我律師出來幫忙,後來 判我無罪,火大告回他們警察誣告罪,忘記憲法第十條自由居住權,防害風化會構成了這條罪,需要的是仲介媒體,及圖利才會構成這條罪,ROC卻知法犯法整我 一連串打不完的官司,超他們,我真是投錯胎,在這世界不承認的國度,http://youtu.be/nkpV2a7DdAk

我是美容美髮美甲芳療師開家庭室工做室,因電磁波腦控曹大偉國安特務加持陷害我20多年一直打不完的官司...
www.youtube.com
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

本 來想裝瘋子面對這次ROC陷害誣告我防害密秘罪事件,想想ROC電磁波腦控已經整害我20多年生意 工作,一切不順利,目地要我回去求曹大偉國安,20多年了,那絕對是辦不到的事,心髒成那樣噁心,及,想想裝瘋子留壞名譽更加沒飯吃,我寧願被你們政腐關 監牢養:至少會有機會再告國際或公佈於國際間,刑事追訴期期限,夠我報仇,順便讓裡面的人膫解這不合法的ROC流亡政腐,一起搞台獨呢,

 

我事先到警分局報案,拿三聯單按鈴告劉文賓...
youtube.com
 

Evidence ROC second time Of leakage of filling eat Litigation case On site ,ROC的法庭現場有錄影設備是為督
察檢察官一定要玩私法,公民們有憲法第七條法律人人平等無階級之分,我當然可學你們私法人反軌證錄影,何況憲法第二條主權在民,第22條憲法保障,你們政 腐是人民聘請,當然可以錄影反軌證,公佈你們瀆職吃案,何況捷星案件吃一次,103年三月當然從新按鈴申告,又漏餡呼嚨霧化證詞案號,現場不錄怎麼可以, 從台中到桃園整個台灣司法一定要密錄對付之,公務員才會老實辦案,我發誓台灣公務員及財團全被電磁波控制住了,不配合財團即倒閉呢!就像我以前唱歌期間, 反抗不嫁ROC國安曹大偉特務,就會被陷害後半身家破人亡,沈落20多年到現在還
繼續一直威逼我呢!
Evidence ROC second time Of leakage of filling eat Litigation case On site
給ROC地檢署私法人看法規,甚麼叫防害隱私權啦!我登你們姓名了嗎,我有寫姓名嗎!我只寫吃案,真實證據不怕毀謗罪,何況我有憲法22條及第七條可反軌證!!公佈你們司法人滅證犯法影片是私人活動,私生活地方嗎!法院,法庭裡是你們家嗎!讀法律讀到那裡去了,請全世界鄙視,扭曲事實丟人現眼,不要臉!
誣告我,硬要關我做牢
PS:隱私權,指個人人格上的利益不受不法僭用或侵害,個人與大眾無合法關聯的私事,亦不得妄予發布公開,而其私人活動,不得以可能做成一般人的精神痛苦 或感覺羞辱之方式非法侵入的權利。是為眾多法律系統所支持的一種人身基本權利。由於它的存在,政府和民間團體的某些活動受到一定的限制。
http://youtu.be/FEWiJKA4_Tc
ROC犯法防害我隱私在先,我的資料已被封鎖一半了,怕我告國際法庭,今年又用電磁波施法至使我的1000TB硬碟燒壞,剛剛又讓我平板無插電源下一直發 燙差點燒壞,還好及時關機,還好還有燒成DVD存證,公民要學習我一切證據還是要燒成DVD較安全呢!他們電磁波特務是有超能力,尤其是曹大偉,所以先 PO一些不重要的在網路存證,重要的已放在外國了,尤其是DVD. Evidence ROC second time Of leakage of filling eat Litigation case On site ,重點:ROC的法庭現場有錄影設備,全是為了督察檢察官一定要配合玩私法所設置的,公民們有憲法第七條法律人人平等無階級之分,我當然可學你們私法人反 軌證錄影,何況憲法第二條主權在民,第22條憲法保障,你們政腐是人民聘請,當然可以錄影反軌證,公佈你們瀆職吃案,何況捷星案件吃一次,103年三月當 然從新按鈴申告,又漏餡呼嚨霧化證詞案號,現場不錄怎麼可以,從台中到桃園整個台灣司法一定要密錄對付之,公務員才會老實辦案,我發誓台灣公務員及財團全 被電磁波控制住了,不配合財團即倒閉呢!就像我以前唱歌期間,反抗不嫁ROC國安曹大偉特務,就會被陷害後半身家破人亡,沈落20多年到現在還
繼續一直威逼我呢!
Evidence ROC second time Of leakage of filling eat Litigation case On site
給ROC地檢署私法人看法規,甚麼叫防害隱私權啦!我登你們姓名了嗎,我有寫姓名嗎!我只寫吃案,真實證據不怕毀謗罪,何況我有憲法22條及第七條可反軌 證!!公佈你們司法人滅證犯法影片是私人活動,私生活地方嗎!法院,法庭裡是你們家嗎!讀法律讀到那裡去了,請全世界鄙視,扭曲事實丟人現眼,不要臉!
誣告我,硬要關我做牢
PS:隱私權,指個人人格上的利益不受不法僭用或侵害,個人與大眾無合法關聯的私事,亦不得妄予發布公開,而其私人活動,不得以可能做成一般人的精神痛苦 或感覺羞辱之方式非法侵入的權利。是為眾多法律系統所支持的一種人身基本權利。由於它的存在,政府和民間團體的某些活動受到一定的限制。
http://youtu.be/FEWiJKA4_T

ROC真實的犯罪防害隱私權證據在此,竟反誣告我防害隱私權
youtube.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Evidence ROC second time Of leakage of filling eat Litigation case On site ,ROC的法庭現場有錄影設備是為督察檢察官一定要玩私法,公民們有憲法第七條法律人人平等無階級之分,我當然可學你們私法人反軌證錄影,何況憲法第二條 主權在民,第22條憲法保障,你們政腐是人民聘請,當然可以錄影反軌證,公佈你們瀆職吃案,何況捷星案件吃一次,103年三月當然從新按鈴申告,又漏餡呼 嚨霧化證詞案號,現場不錄怎麼可以,從台中到桃園整個台灣司法一定要密錄對付之,公務員才會老實辦案,我發誓台灣公務員及財團全被電磁波控制住了,不配合 財團即倒閉呢!就像我以前唱歌期間,反抗不嫁ROC國安曹大偉特務,就會被陷害後半身家破人亡,沈落20多年到現在還
繼續一直威逼我呢!
Evidence ROC second time Of leakage of filling eat Litigation case On site
給ROC地檢署私法人看法規,甚麼叫防害隱私權啦!我登你們姓名了嗎,我有寫姓名嗎!我只寫吃案,真實證據不怕毀謗罪,何況我有憲法22條及第七條可反軌證!!公佈你們司法人滅證犯法影片是私人活動,私生活地方嗎!法院,法庭裡是你們家嗎!讀法律讀到那裡去了,請全世界鄙視,扭曲事實丟人現眼,不要臉!
誣告我,硬要關我做牢
PS:隱私權,指個人人格上的利益不受不法僭用或侵害,個人與大眾無合法關聯的私事,亦不得妄予發布公開,而其私人活動,不得以可能做成一般人的精神痛苦 或感覺羞辱之方式非法侵入的權利。是為眾多法律系統所支持的一種人身基本權利。由於它的存在,政府和民間團體的某些活動受到一定的限制。
http://youtu.be/FEWiJKA4_Tc

星展銀行竄改房貸合約利率要正本不給第一次,電話已約好給我貸款合約正本拍照存證,可是騙我三次不敢給,也不敢當面對帳算給我看,...
youtube.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
  • 給 ROC台中地檢署私法人看法規,甚麼叫防害隱私權啦!我登你們名子了嗎,我有寫內容資料嗎!我只寫吃案,真實證據不怕毀謗罪,何況我有憲法22條及第七條 可反軌證!!公佈你們司法人滅證犯法影片是私人活動,私生活地方嗎!法院,法庭裡是你們家嗎!讀法律讀到那裡去了,全世界鄙視,扭曲事實丟人現眼,不要臉 來誣告我,硬要關我做牢
    PS: 隱私權,指個人人格上的利益不受不法僭用或侵害,個人與大眾無合法關聯的私事,亦不得妄予發布公開,而其私人活動,不得以可能做成一般人的精神痛苦或感覺 羞辱之方式非法侵入的權利。是為眾多法律系統所支持的一種人身基本權利。由於它的存在,政府和民間團體的某些活動受到一定的限制。
  • 一同公佈電磁波腦控被roc私法整害的公民拒做國際小三無國際身份公民,視同難民耶!難怪會被ROC欺侮,下毒油毒死我們!大家去歐巴馬FB部落格認親喔!(用舊金山條約)認歐巴馬為台灣總統
    喔!
    超你馬台中地檢處全部司法人請看自己訂的法律,自打耳光不遵守,還亂集體告我防害密密罪,及防害隱私罪,因該是防害你們私法人法庭內公然辦案

    之(淹滅證據),賺取財團大紅包的公眾服務之公務員的隱私權吧!枉法,

    給ROC台中地檢署私法人看法規,甚麼叫防害隱私權啦!我登你們名子了嗎
    !,我有寫內容資料嗎!我只寫吃案,真實證據不怕毀謗罪,何況我有憲法22條及第七條可反軌證!!公佈你們司法人滅證犯法影片是私生活地方嗎!法院,法庭裡是你們家嗎!讀法律讀到那裡去了,全世界鄙視,扭曲事實丟人現眼,不要臉來誣告我,硬要關我做牢

    PS: 隱私權,指個人人格上的利益不受不法僭用或侵害,個人與大眾無合法關聯的私事,亦不得妄予發布公開,而其私人活動,不得以可能做成一般人的精神痛苦或感覺 羞辱之方式非法侵入的權利。是為眾多法律系統所支持的一種人身基本權利。由於它的存在,政府和民間團體的某些活動受到一定的限制。
    請看維基網址 :

    http://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E9%9A%90%E7%A7%81

    《世界人權宣言》編輯

    隱私權在聯合國頒布的《世界人權宣言》中的第十二條[1]中明確定義:



    任何人的私生活、家庭、住宅和通信不得任意干涉,他的榮譽和名譽不得加以攻擊。 人人有權享受法律保護,以免受這種干涉或攻擊。



    侵害隱私行為編輯

    一般而言,侵害隱私的行為包括:

    侵擾被害人之幽居寧靜或秘密

    新聞界編輯

    大多數人,特別是廣受媒體關注的人,認為他們的個人生活被媒體報導是一種侵犯隱私權的行為。然而新聞業人士則認為大眾有權知道處於公眾人物狀態的那些人的個人信息。這種區別被蘊含於大多數司法習慣中。

    各地的隱私權法制現況編輯

    美國

    主條目:隱私權 (美國)

    Warren 和Brandeisy在一八九O年,於《哈佛法學評論》提出的「隱私權」(The Right to Privacy)論文,開啟了後世對於隱私權的討論。在這篇文章中,Warren與Brandeis從侵權行為法 (tort) 的角度,建立了隱私權的存在依據,並主張「不受干擾的權利」(right to be let alone)。文章中的許多論點對於後來的實務見解和學說,至今仍有很大的影響。

    William L. Prosser教授在《加州法學評論》上發表的「隱私」一文,提出四種侵害類型:不合理的干擾私人領域、公開真實的私人事實、使用真實的訊息,造成錯誤的印象、未經授權盜用個人的名稱或肖像。

    法院判例證實,墮胎權、公共電話亭里的談話、家中持有物品被隱私權保護,而丟棄的垃圾不屬隱私。

    中華民國(臺灣地區)

    主條目:隱私權 (台灣)

    司法院大法官於釋字第585號解釋[2],明白承認隱私權受憲法所保障,隱私權雖非憲法明文列舉之權利,惟基於人性尊嚴與個人主體性之維護及人格發展之完整,隱私權乃為不可或缺之基本權利,而受憲法第二十二條所保障。

    至 於隱私權的保護範圍,依釋字第603號解釋[3],可分為「空間隱私」與「私密隱私」兩部分。所謂空間隱私,指「保障個人生活私密領域免於他人侵擾及個人 資料之自主控制」,所謂私密隱私,指「保障人民決定是否揭露其個人資料、及在何種範圍內、於何時、以何種方式、向何人揭露之決定權,並保障人民對其個人資 料之使用有知悉與控制權及資料記載錯誤之更正權。」

    中華人民共和國(大陸地區)

    法律涉及隱私權內容主要有如下條款:

    一、中華人民共和國憲法

    參見編輯

    病歷隱私權台灣媒體亂象、香港媒體爭議、媒體偏見

    參考文獻編輯

    1.Don R. Pember ,Mass Media Law 2003 / 2004 Edition,McGraw-Hill Companies, The (2002) ISBN 0-07-249217-1

    ^ http://www.humanrights-china.org/....../R120011029133820.htm^ 釋字第 585 號 解釋爭點:真調會條例違憲?. 司法院大法官會議. 2004-12-15 [2009-05-02].^ 釋字第 603 號 解釋爭點:戶籍法第8條第2、3項捺指紋始核發身分證規定違憲?. 司法院大法官會議. 2005-09-28 [2009-05-02

    隐私权 - 维基百科,自由的百科全书
    zh.wikipedia.org
    隱 私權,指個人人格上的利益不受不法僭用或侵害,個人與大眾無合法關聯的私事,亦不得妄予發布公開,而其私人活動,不得以可能做成一般人的精神痛苦或感覺羞 辱之方式非法侵入的權利。是为众多法律系统所支持的一种人身基本权利。由于它的存在,政府和民间团体的某些活动受到一定的限制。
    9月10日 11:56 · 讚
    zh.wikipedia.org
    隱私權,指個人人格上的利益不受不法僭用或侵害,個人與大眾無合法關聯的私事,亦不得妄予發布公開,而其私人活動,不得以可能做成一般人的精神痛苦或感覺羞辱之方式非法侵入的權利。是为众多法律系统所支持的一种人身基本权利。由于它的存在,政府和民间团体的某些活动受到一定的限制。
文章標籤
創作者介紹

bibi2009pc的部落格

bibi2009pc 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()