What is <administrative orders>, the country only in the same administrative system in order to use administrative orders; Taiwan and China unusual countries, how do you use the administrative orders, Congress Legislature is the highest non-administrative system, with administrative orders work?

 

Business matters business matters rights people business matters! Constitution with international (self-determination) is greater than the ROC rank (police authority) partners to sit together a business trip! Reject tax ROC national tax revolt would collapse five months

 

!

 

  洽公 洽公 權民洽公!用國際憲法(自決權)位階 大於 ROC的(警察權)一同坐夥來洽公!拒絕繳稅 全民抗稅五個月ROC就要倒閉

.. 0

 ·

馬政府對外宣稱有按照WTO規範,但卻沒按照規定通知WTO,WTO也公開表示沒收到通知,而服貿有些規定超過WTO規定(民進黨服貿修正版有指出超過的條款)

馬與新加坡跟紐西蘭簽約時有WTO監督,與中國則沒有WTO監督,為何不找WTO來監督與中國簽約?且簽約後才公告 ,也不說是誰去簽的

這個內容決議美國對於台灣的政治經濟軍事的支持會比以前做得更多,並會支持台灣加入TPP。且更之前美國總統也表態非常支持台灣加入

<a>http://www.c-span.org/video/?318304-1%2Fhearing-ustaiwan-relations</a>

而不是馬英九說的, 得先簽服貿才能簽TPP。馬英九已經公然說謊!!!

美國的TPP就是專門為了要圍堵中國,因此日本根本就不跟中國談服貿,避免跟美國談TPP條件弱勢起來,因為服貿很容易讓中國開啟美國TPP市場的後門,美國總統與國會都很支持台灣加入TPP,這些在國際媒體都有報導,但馬就是不回應,還在國內騙說得先服貿才能TPP

這是馬政府與國民黨違反程序的文章,大部分內容是無法扯蛋反駁低:
http://www.thenewslens.com/post/31115/

補充說明:行政命令無立法修法的必要,才可以時效到了直接通過,有立法修法的必要時(服貿內容與現行法規有牴觸且牽涉廣有立法監督必要),得先立法院另外立法修法合乎行政命令內容時才能通過,之前張強行通過的是委員會,之後才會移交到立法院會上審議,而張違反委員會程序,目前判定無效,且委員會已決議服貿退回重新談判

服貿是國際約(屬總統行政命令權)並不是一般的國內法,國際約在立法院上只能審不能改,只有通過與不通過這兩樣選擇(想通過就得先立法修法合乎服貿內容),因此可以退回,並不是政府說不能退,如果要改得要總統派人去跟對方國家協商改,因此總統與在野黨得先協商好,不然會引發嚴重抗爭(馬根本就不鳥在野黨0..0),因此國際約如何修改的重點是總統並不是立法院,立法院只能通過與不通過而已,偏偏現在國民黨都想要推給王金平



因此有習慣看國際媒體的人,就會發現馬在很多議題上,國外與國內的說法根本就不一樣!根本就是說謊成性的人,政治家最重要之一就是不能說謊,就是9.2%要支持說謊的人



99%的國家都是先簽貨貿而不是服貿,因為貨貿對國家的經濟成面上更為重要且無人員定居問題,為何馬不先簽?

看服貿大綱中國開放項目多台灣開放項目少,但實際中國可以用限制很多(一半的限制都是跟中國本身的行政有關,而不是跟服貿有關,但服貿擴大了可以讓中國更加控制住台灣的資金產業與市場),而台灣則讓中商幾乎很自由,在細條內實際上是開放一大堆的行業給中國人創立與買,佔了台灣八成產業,且細條裡面很多是開放敏感行業(有些敏感的行業不得超過50%或12%,但大公司的50%或10%就很多了...辜家才佔中信8%而已),這就是大部分人在罵的地方,這大綱看起來中國讓利,但實際上細條內容根本就是台灣吃虧且敏感行業容易被控制,專門就是要騙不去了解的人0..0

所以就是要立法修法來監督咩,支持目前服貿的人難道沒有維護國家的觀念?難道立法限制一年來台定居人數(畢竟目前開放是範圍大技術性低的產業跟以往不同)與一些敏感的行業不開放買下如電信網路媒體醫療工程(媒體目前沒開放,不過最好先立法限制起來)...等等這樣至少無法光明正大買下,不至於太高調無視於人


中國行政上訂一大堆限制,台灣也可以,自從2008年就提案相關監督法案,但到現在被國民黨擋掉了108次,可見國民黨根本就沒打算監督與有空間幫台商與台灣爭取更多福利咩,且中國為了將來美國的TPP急著跟台灣簽服貿,按照情勢來談判,台灣應該可以跟中國簽中國吃虧的不平等協議才對,為何在馬跟國民黨的領導下反而簽下台灣吃虧的不平等協議?

經濟部公布第二次兩岸服貿協議評估報告,創造GDP效益僅0.025%,10年後台灣的GDP最多只增加1.34億美元,相當於統一超商一周的營收,因為服貿主要只是讓中國人買下台灣本來的產業與市場而已

中國行政不承認中華民國工商登記,台商皆得使用中共政府的工商登記,服貿簽了以後就算要進口到台灣,台灣也徵不到台商的工商稅與進口稅(因為馬政府稅不二徵,且有中共政府工商登記進口會便宜許多,進口商都會使用中共政府的工商登記),與在中國賺的錢很難匯回台灣,所以才會對台灣GDP本身的增加不大...

但多了中資的刺激,對台灣總是有幫助,這就是為何要創立兩岸監督法案與發回重新談判,至少中國如何限制台灣,台灣也要如何限制中國,以爭取談判空間與稅收(稅制不改會很難收到台商的稅與進口稅),不然台灣人有必要為10年GDP增加1.34億美元來傷害國家利益嗎?

民進黨有提案服貿修正版感覺嚴格許多且尤其對敏感行業限制很嚴,也對台商與台灣爭取更多福利,不過洗衣美髮美容這種行業對國家安全無關,定那麼嚴格,就看這些行業與一般人民和中國藍營買不買單了,這時就看藍綠中協商了

台灣人民可以向美國連署公開馬的美國國籍何時放棄,甚至根本沒放棄,到時可能可以宣布馬當選總統無效@@

台灣關係法:

美國總統如遇臺灣人民的安全或社會經濟制度遭受威脅,因而危及美國利益時,應迅速通知國會。總統和國會將依憲法程序,決定美國應付上述危險所應採取的適當行動。

美國法律將繼續對臺灣適用,就像1979年1月1日之前,美國法律對臺灣適用的情形一樣。

以上這些是台灣人在美國的權力,皆可以在白宮連署或直接在美國打司法官司要求美國政府這樣做,這是有成功先例可循的(有台派人士在美國司法抗辯,要求美國要按照法規行事,因此之後美國按照國際觀與台灣關係法把台灣人民的國籍正名為[台灣])




沒有民選的權力說是獨立是騙人的,因此目前的憲法說是五權分立就

是在騙人民而已(孫中山先生死亡多年憲法才有國民黨制定好),中央政權實際上只有總統行政權與立法權這兩權而已,其他三權人事都是此兩權掌握的,總統與立法院過半以上的立委會找非自己人當嗎?

按照孫中山先生的理念,真正需要政黨身分的政務官只有總統與立委跟行政院而已,其他中立權力的政務官都不需要政黨身分(一般的公務員事務官本來就不能有政黨身分),只是要按照法規與職權行事即可,因此我認為只要是該中立的權力,人事權就不可以讓總統立委行政院管理才對(軍人本就不參內政,因此總統可以管理)

而是該由人民直接選出來,比較複雜且監督性強的則由人民直接選出,如總統,五院,大法官,檢察總長,法務部長(得無政黨,避免檢察官人事權與死刑被政黨控制),警察署長(得無政黨,如此不會被政黨操作打壓人民),比較單純的中立機構則由某個或數個被民選出來單位,投票決定人選,如公審會之類,這樣就不會太浪費人民選舉時間跟費用

當然某些中立民選單位任用或升遷退職,候選人或投票者必須要有某個專業身分或階級才行,如司法單位則是有法官檢察官律師身分才能出來選跟投票權,但最高階的一定得要一般人民投票出來,這樣才不會跟社會與人民脫節,搞出個廢死司法最高政務官出來(讓廢死團體真的要廢死,就一定得要在立法院立法修法才行)


且監察院與考試院的權力應該提高,不然只能打蚊子不能打老虎,而這兩院如何提高權力與如何被其他民選單位監督則牽扯很廣,制定的好可以幫人民很多事情,但權力過大會讓國家亂或空轉,權力過小只是當米蟲而已

目前的公投法與罷免法也是門檻過高人民權力過小,造成人民無法監督政府,這些都必須改,議員單一選區制(單一選區可以減少著名的黑道人物或廢死等等冷門政見選上,除非此人在此區真的有實力...)應該把並立制改成聯立制(聯立制可以避免一黨獨大)再加上絕對勝選制(勝選者一定要50%以上有效得票率,第一次沒有50%以上,則選出前面兩位候選人在隔週投票)

另外也要陪審團制,如此大方向改好,就是我的理想民主國家了0..0

Wu Dinghong


Domestic politics two

Foreign governments have claimed the horse in accordance with WTO norms, but no notification in accordance with the WTO, WTO also said publicly that did not receive notice of , and serve over some provisions WTO trade regulations ( DPP clothing trade has pointed out more than a modified version of the terms )

 


Malaysia , New Zealand and Singapore have signed with the WTO when supervision, and China is no WTO supervision, why not find the WTO to monitor and China signed ? After the announcement and signing not tell you who to sign

 


The content of the resolution the U.S. economic and military support for Taiwan 's political will to do more than ever before , and will support Taiwan to join TPP. More before the U.S. president will also say very supportive of Taiwan's accession

 


http://www.c-span.org/video/?318304-1%2Fhearing-ustaiwan-relations "><a> http://www.c-span.org/video/?318304-1% 2Fhearing-ustaiwan-relations </ a>

 


Ma Ying-jeou said instead , you must first sign service trade to sign TPP. Ma Ying-jeou has blatantly lied ! ! !

 


TPP is specifically designed for the U.S. to contain China , so Japan does not talk about service trade with China , to avoid talking about the conditions of vulnerable TPP up with the United States because it is easy for China trade dress open back door of the U.S. market, TPP , the U.S. President and Congress have it support Taiwan to join TPP, these are reported in the international media , but the horse is not responding , still lie right before serving domestic trade to TPP

 

 

This is a violation of article Ma and the KMT government program , most of the content is not bullshit refute Low:


http://www.thenewslens.com/post/31115/

 


Additional information: Executive Order No State Law Changes necessary before they can directly limitation to , if necessary, have been enacted Law Changes (the clothes trade content with current regulations have inconsistent and involve many legislative oversight is necessary ) , the legislature must first meet another State Law Changes when the contents of an executive order to pass , before Zhang was forced through the Commission , after which the meeting will be handed over to the legislature for consideration , and Zhang violation of committee procedures , currently held invalid , and the Committee has resolved to return to renegotiate trade services

 


International trade is serving about ( presidential executive order is right ) is not an ordinary domestic law, international trial about the Legislature can not be changed , and not only through the choice by these two ( want to have to first meet the clothing trade legislation Law Changes content ) , it can be returned , not the government says can not be refunded , if you want to change the president have to send someone to talk to each other to change the national consultation , so the president and the opposition must first negotiated , otherwise it will lead to serious protests ( horse simply not a bird opposition Party 0 .. 0 ) , so the focus is international president about how to modify the legislature is not , the legislature can not pass it through , but why now wants to push the KMT to Wang Jin

 

 

 


Therefore, the international media have the habit of watching people , you will find a horse on many issues , foreign and domestic argument simply is not the same ! Simply lie by nature , the most important one is that politicians can not lie , that is 9.2% to support the liar

 

 

 


99% of the country is a sign and trade goods rather than services trade, because of the country's economic and trade goods into the surface and no person is more important to settle the issue , why not sign the horse ?

 


Outline China trade clothes look much less open project open the project in Taiwan , but the reality can be a lot of China ( half of the restrictions with China are concerned with the administration 's own limitations , rather than with the clothing trade related, but expanded trade dress can make China more control living in Taiwan industry and market funds ) , while Taiwan is very nearly let the providers freedom in thin strips are actually open to a lot of industry and the creation of the Chinese people to buy , representing eighty percent of Taiwan's industries, and a lot of thin strips which are open sensitive sectors ( some sensitive sectors should not exceed 50 % or 12 %, but 50% or 10% of large companies on the lot ... Koo family was accounted for only 8% of CITIC ), this is the place most people curse , which outline China looks none other , but in fact is simply thin pieces of content industry in Taiwan and sensitive easily lose control , specifically is to deceive people who do not understand the 0 .. 0

 


So is to establish Law Changes to oversee baa , who support the current MAST Did not maintain the concept of country ? Does legislation to limit the number of a year to settle ( after all, is currently open lower range of technical industries different from the past ) and some sensitive industries such as telecommunications network is not open media buying medical engineering ( media not currently open , but it is best to legislative restrictions ) ... so this can not be openly bought at least , will not be too high to ignore the human tone

 

 

 


China provides a lot of administrative restrictions , Taiwan can, since 2008 on the proposal related to oversight bill, but up to now by the KMT block off 108 times , showing the KMT did not intend to supervision and there is room to help Taiwan and Taiwan to fight more多 福利baa , China and the United States for the future TPP trade dress hurry to sign with Taiwan , according to the situation to negotiate , Taiwan should be able to sign with China China suffer unequal agreement fishes, why, under the leadership of the KMT's Ma instead signed with Taiwan suffer inequality agreement ?

 


Ministry of Economic Affairs announced the second assessment report of cross-strait trade agreements serve to create effective only 0.025% of GDP , 10 years after Taiwan's GDP increased by a maximum of $ 134 million , the equivalent of one week 's PCSC revenue , mainly because clothing trade just let China who originally bought the Taiwan industry and market it

 


Administration does not recognize the Republic of China business registration , business registration Taiwan Chieh-te use of the Chinese government , even after signing trade dress to be imported to Taiwan Taiwan Taiwan 's industrial and commercial tax levy is less than the import duties ( because Ma government tax Fuji Zheng, the Chinese government and there is a lot cheaper to register imports of Commerce , the importer will use commercial registration of the Chinese government ) , and in China is difficult to remit money back to Taiwan , so Taiwan's GDP will not increase its own ...

 


But more stimulus funding , there is always helpful to Taiwan , which is why the bill should oversee the creation of cross-strait negotiations and back again , at least how to limit China Taiwan , Taiwan also how to limit China to fight negotiating space and tax ( tax Taiwanese do not change will be difficult to receive tax and import duties ) , or Taiwanese necessary for the 10 -year GDP increased by $ 134 million to harm the national interest it?

 


DPP amended version of a proposal clothes feel tight in many trade and restrictions are very strict , especially on sensitive sectors , but also to attract more Taiwanese and Taiwanese welfare , but this washing hair and beauty industry unrelated to national security , will be less stringent , to see these industries and the general people and the Chinese buying a single blue camp , and then you see the blue-green in negotiated

 


When the people of Taiwan to the United States may petition publicly renounce U.S. citizenship horse , or even did not give up , when it might be declared invalid President-elect Ma @ @

 


Taiwan Relations Act :

 


U.S. President as security or the social economic system threatened the people of Taiwan , and thus threaten U.S. interests , shall promptly notify Congress . The President and the Congress in accordance with constitutional procedures will determine the appropriate action to deal with these dangers the United States should take .

 


U.S. law will continue to apply to Taiwan , just prior to January 1, 1979 , U.S. law as applicable to the situation in Taiwan .

 


These are the people of Taiwan power in the United States , are a direct hit can petition or judicial lawsuit asked the U.S. government to do so in the United States at the White House , which is a successful precedent (there are people in the United States -Taiwan defense of Justice , asked the U.S. to follow regulatory act , so after the United States in accordance with international perspectives and the Taiwan Relations Act to name the nationality of the people of Taiwan for [ Taiwan ] )

 

 

 

 

 

 

The authority said that no elected independent is a lie, so the current constitutional separation of powers would be said to be five


Is lying to the people it ( Sun Yat-sen died many years to develop a good constitution only KMT ) , the central government actually only two executive president and the legislative authority only, the other three are the right personnel to master these two rights , the President and the Legislative Yuan half more than one of us when legislators will find non it?

 


According to Mr. Sun's philosophy, political identity Administrative Officer really needs only the president and legislators with only the Executive Yuan , Administrative Officer, other neutral powers do not need political identity ( General Civil Service officers already can not have any political identity ) , just to to act in accordance with regulations and the terms of reference , so I think as long as the power of the neutral, would not allow the president the right personnel management legislators Yuan fishes ( not participate in the internal affairs of the military , so the president can manage )

 


The directly elected by the people but out relatively complex and strong oversight directly elected by the people , such as the president , five homes, Justice , Attorney General , Minister of Justice ( have no political parties, the right personnel and prosecutors to avoid the death penalty is a political party control ) , the Commissioner of Police ( have no political parties, so the people can not be suppressed political operation ) , relatively simple by a neutral body to be elected or several units , voted to candidates , such as a public trial would be like, so as not to will be a waste of time with the people of the election expenses

 


Of course, some neutral units appointment or promotion retirement elected , candidates or voters must have a professional capacity or class job as a judge is a judicial unit prosecutors solicitor to stand for election with voting rights , but the most high-end got to come out to the general vote of the people , so as not out of touch with the community and the people , come up with a scrap died highest judicial administrative officer out ( so that the dead bodies really want to waste scrap death , we will certainly have to stand in the Legislative Yuan Law Changes for the job )

 

 

 


Examination Yuan and the Control Yuan and power should improve , or can not fight a tiger to fight mosquitoes , which both houses of how to improve the power and how is it involved supervising other elected units wide , can help the people to develop a good many things , but the power let the National Assembly over the chaos or idle power is just too small when it Michong

 


The current law also recall referendum law and people's power threshold is too high too small , causing the people can not supervise the government , these have to be changed , the Honourable single constituency system ( single constituency can be reduced on the famous underworld figure died so unpopular political views or scrap the election, unless this person is really strong in this area ... ) should be side by side into a system of simultaneous system ( the system prevents simultaneous one-party dominance ) plus the absolute victory made ( the victor must be more than 50% of the vote valid rate, for the first time no more than 50%, the two candidates in the previous election vote every other week )

 


Also have a jury system , so the general direction of changing for the better , is my ideal democracies 0 .. 0

 

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
創作者介紹

bibi2009pc的部落格

bibi2009pc 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()